Shawn Hessinger

E-Chat Recap: Dating Data Lacks Sufficient Dimension

NO RATINGS
View Comments: Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Ariella
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Online Kismet
Ariella   3/24/2012 11:20:10 PM
NO RATINGS
An online dating inforgraphic was just posted on Mashable

Pierre DeBois
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Online Kismet
Pierre DeBois   2/22/2012 7:32:37 AM
NO RATINGS
Ariella's point is an excellent one, Shawn.  One advantage of the profiles is that you get to choose  what kind of personal statistics that you want to deal with.  Prefer a smoker? It's on the profile versus having to raise the question in a conversation.  Even in business networking some questions, while essential to specific decisions, can be awkward to ask - When was the last time you've seen a business development manager openly ask a prospective contect at an expo if they can pay? The same amount of balancing inteerst and interrogation can happen in dating. Profiles provide a personal vetting process.

Pierre DeBois
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Online Kismet
Pierre DeBois   2/22/2012 7:22:17 AM
NO RATINGS
Shawn,

I think the answer for many people lies somewhere between increasing the odds and a belief that "no algorthm that really pick the best for me".  People like to believ in something more emotional than being quantifies.  They may allow it to some degree based on the widespread availability of analytics, but most people want to believe that their personal decisions influenced the chances for love, even in a dating site.

Lyndon_Henry
User Rank
Blogger
Analytics plus singles bars?
Lyndon_Henry   2/21/2012 10:26:41 PM
NO RATINGS
Unfortunately I missed participating in the poll. In any case I came out of the E-chat slightly less skeptical about the dating services and their analytics than I went into it.

For people that can relate to basically blind dating (and it's not totally "blind", I found out), it's probably an improvement, especially if they need something to overcome any inertia. I've also referred several times to putting yourself in what Dr. Phil calls a "target-rich environment", and probably narrowing down the field to lots of people with common interests can do this.

On the other hand, there's still a lot that can be said for the singles bar (in which not all are singles, of course, but leaving that aside...) Seems to me that the new business model for an innovative dating service would be to combine the analytics with its compatibility selection process with specialized singles bars, where all the people meeting the compatibility criteria would have a chance to do whatever they do there besides getting sloshed. At least they'd have a chance to give the old "It' factor a chance as well as improve the possibilities for the Click.

Wonder how a name like Love Analytics would work for a singles bar... My mind is already starting to invent the new cocktails...

Shawn Hessinger
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Online Kismet
Shawn Hessinger   2/21/2012 8:33:52 PM
NO RATINGS
Hospice and Ariella,

Another thought brought up during our chat about a better way to think of the benefits dating sites actually do provide. As I quoted him in the wrap up blog above, AllAnalytics.com blogger Cordell Wise suggests:

It could be a problem of defining the objective function. Do you really expect a successful relationship from a dating site, or is it enough to increase the odds of such?

Hospice_Houngbo
User Rank
Prospector
Re: Online Kismet
Hospice_Houngbo   2/21/2012 6:08:42 PM
NO RATINGS

@Callmebob


It sounds like your friend's perseverance has finally paid off. But most people don't have this stamina and they would have given up after the first frustration. That is what makes us say that dating sites are not the convenient places to find one's soulmate.

Shawn Hessinger
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Online Kismet
Shawn Hessinger   2/21/2012 2:45:13 PM
NO RATINGS
I think you said it best during the chat, Ariella:

To be fair, it is better than a singles bar, and the singles events that a friend of mine described to me sound like nightmares. Introverts, in particular, would probably find it easier to initiate contact online. One just has to realize that the real test will come in person.

Ariella
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Online Kismet
Ariella   2/21/2012 2:33:39 PM
NO RATINGS
@Callmebob, yes, that's exactly it. Your own story reminds me of an episode in From Time to Time, in which one character deliberately gets in the way to prevent two people from meeting and marrying. He has the best intentions, of course. 

Callmebob
User Rank
Master Analyst
Re: Online Kismet
Callmebob   2/21/2012 2:13:59 PM
NO RATINGS
@Ariella - Can't disagree with you. All love matches are happenstance, 1 sample about my friend proves nothing and is strictly anecdotal. I met my wife on a street corner (No, not that kind of street corner) in a city of 12 million. So 1 in 12 million are not very good odds and is on par with the lottery. If I had been 30 seconds delayed, crossed a different street, or stopped to tie my shoe I could still be single today. To me, it's all about reducing the odds. If it helps, try online dating. If it doesn't, go to the MOMA and wait for someone to ask you to explain that Jackson Pollock painting you've been staring at for hours.

Ariella
User Rank
Blogger
Re: Online Kismet
Ariella   2/21/2012 1:46:51 PM
NO RATINGS
@Callmebob We all love happy endings, but from a scientific perspective, such testimonials are not real proof of greater effectiveness. As you point out, on the intital run, your friends got somewhat frustrated with the process of online dating. It was only because he gave it another shot that he met someone who clicked with on it. The same could happen at singles events, too. You could get overwhelmed at one and then return to a second one where you happen to meet up with someone you like.  Or you could keep mulling around bookstores until you strike up a conversation with someone you want to keep saying -- a tactic I'm told some singles adopt. Anything could work, but the fact that a particular tactic worked for someone you know is not conclusive.  It would be rather like  as a lottery winner bought his ticket at this store, I can conclude that this is a lucky location.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Information Resources
More Blogs from Shawn Hessinger
Some observers believe data sensitivity remains a major barrier.
The key to improving heathcare outcomes is to look at individual needs, the companies say.
In Wednesday's e-chat, we discussed the analytics of identification and whether the technology might find a bigger role one day in marketing intelligence.
The 9th Annual SAS Health Care & Life Sciences Executive Conference convened this week as thought leaders gathered to discuss how to improve care while reducing costs.
A UK researcher will be on hand at 11:00 a.m. ET to discuss how biometrics means far more than retina scans and fingerprints.
Quick Poll
Quick Poll
Information Resources
Radio Show
A2 Conversations
UPCOMING
James M. Connolly
How Colleges and Tech Are Grooming Analytics Talent


9/7/2016   REGISTER   0
ARCHIVE
James M. Connolly
How Machine Learning Takes Handwriting Recognition to New Levels


8/25/2016  LISTEN   39
ARCHIVE
AllAnalytics
A Look at Tomorrow's Data Scientist


8/9/2016  LISTEN   82
ARCHIVE
James M. Connolly
Analytics and the Making of a President


7/21/2016  LISTEN   76
ARCHIVE
James M. Connolly
Analytics: Where We've Been, Where We're Going


7/12/2016  LISTEN   48
ARCHIVE
James M. Connolly
How Predictive Analytics Can Take Your Company to the Next Level


6/28/2016  LISTEN   22
ARCHIVE
James M. Connolly
How Analytics Can Transform State Government


5/17/2016  LISTEN   51
ARCHIVE
James M. Connolly
Save Labor Costs With Predictive Analytics


5/10/2016  LISTEN   53
ARCHIVE
James M. Connolly
What the IoT Means to You and Your Insurer


5/6/2016  LISTEN   75
ARCHIVE
James M. Connolly
When It's Time for a Robot's Job Review


4/27/2016  LISTEN   21
ARCHIVE
James M. Connolly
How Advanced Analytics Serve Healthcare


4/12/2016  LISTEN   88
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  Help  |  Register  |  Twitter  |  Facebook  |  RSS