- by Broadway0474, Blogger
- 4/27/2015 10:38:04 PM
And some form of brain disease from all that EM radiation. I know I risk sounding like someone who connects vaccines with autism or something, but cellphones so close to our brains cannot be a good thing. Even my electrical engineering brother has his doubts about the safety...
- 4/26/2015 10:39:47 AM
Besides the carpal tunnel issue associated with typing on phones, watch for more elbow issues, considering how much time some people have their elbows bent holding the phone to their ear while they yack away.
- by Broadway0474, Blogger
- 4/25/2015 10:16:40 PM
Lyndon, is there scientific proof that all our eyesight has been "aged" by 40 or so years? Or are you being fecetitious? I'd posit that the bigger problem is the carpal tunnel we all will have in 5-10 years, as well as higher blood pressure for us all. As soon as the damn autocorrect starts messing with my emails, I can feel my face go flush with blood and my toes clench!
- 4/22/2015 9:11:52 AM
@Lyndon. True, the phone manufacturers could have done a better job (or at least earlier) to make their screens more readable, and they have come a long way in the past couple of years. However, adaptive and responsive design for web sites goes beyond type faces and sizes. They mean rethinking how you organize a site. Consider the classic homepage of five years ago. Design teams (including sales, events and editorial) crammed every possible thing into the homepage and really crammed to get more items "above the fold" so they were viewable without scrolling. That was even after site managers recognized that viewers didn't use the homepage the way they did old newspapers. People were increasingly likely to access site content not by typing in the homepage url but through search, newsletters, social media, etc.
The new approaches to site design (there are differences between adaptive and responsive but both require rethinking) allow readers/viewers to work their way through content in smaller doses, with an emphasis on what the individual site visitor is likely to want to see. In that way, you minimize the required amount of scrolling up and down and side to side to see what you need.
Apply this logic to a web-based application. When you, as an employee, log in -- whether on a desktop or mobile device -- your login tells the system what your role is (employee or manager, for example). If you aren't a manager, the system only presents the options that you would need as an employee, such as requesting a day off or filing an overtime report. If you are a manager, what you see are your own options as an employee yourself. However, you also would see that you have requests from your direct reports that need approval/review. Each of your roles would take you into different workflows. In that way you see only the tasks/options that you need to see, not options that don't even apply to your job type or your department.
- by Lyndon_Henry, Blogger
- 4/21/2015 11:35:07 PM
While I see the usefulness of overhauling one's website (if you can afford it) to make it more mobile-friendly, I also wonder why the onus has been placed on all the gazillions of website owners and not on the relative handful of device manufacturers to somehow make their displays more readable.
In any case, the latest developments from Google (to in effect mandate mobile-friendliness, aka making web data more visible on a tiny screen) suggest to me a kind of dual irony. First, the entire population of smartphone users have been facing the same kind of readability difficulties that seniors (aka old folks) have always faced. In other words, smartphones have brought on the kind of eyesight/readability problems faced by older people, so in effect everybody's eyesight has gotten aged about 40-50 years or so by dint of the popularity of smartphones.
The second ironic element is that this Triumph of the Teeny-Weeny comes after years of a marketing orgy to equip us all with nice wide screens and ultra-wide screens on our desktop PCs and laptops. And humongous wall-sized TV monitors, aiming in effect to turn our living rooms into home movie theatres. So we've gone from efforts to sell us larger and larger screens, now to efforts to acclimate us to teenier and tinier screens. And now we have Google's edict that if your website doesn't cater to the teeny-weeny, it will be banished to oblivion when anybody searches for something relevant to it.
- 4/21/2015 11:11:33 AM
@kq4ym. As all types of businesses turn more of their focus to connecting to customers through smart phones, and customers take charge (at least to some degree) it will be interesting to see how the data plays out in terms of what business strategies work. I wonder how the balance will fall when it comes to customers wanting to "pull" content as they need it versus businesses "pushing" content out to customers when the business thinks the customer might like it.
- by kq4ym, Data Doctor
- 4/21/2015 10:05:44 AM
And with mobile taking the lead (and Google this week announcing it's revising it's search reaults to favor mobile) the possibility of marketing by phones to "live" customers is going to be a vastly different atmosphere than shoppers have ever seen before.
- by Michelle, Data Doctor
- 4/18/2015 1:27:02 PM
I don't know about you but it's kinda fun for me to step back from shopping to take in all the tactics being used to steer me toward specific products. Knowing the angle doesn't always keep the impulse buy from taking a few extra bucks each trip.
- by kq4ym, Data Doctor
- 4/15/2015 5:53:36 PM
How true about retail changing rapidly, "we get a public view of how the changes are implemented every time we shop." Now, it's going to be very important to make customer choice easier and easier and the choices consumers have attractive enough to get them to pull out that electronic wallet and pay and not go on to another store, digitally or physically.