- by Jessica Davis, Blogger
- 1/6/2017 10:46:36 AM
In this particular case, I wonder if this is a matter of cultural resistance to giving up control. The manager is using Excel and forcing his employees to use it. What would it take to persuade him that a different approach would be better? Would he need to have control (and mastery) over that other platform? Or does he need to experience the pain of what goes wrong when you use an inadquate tool before he would consider alternatives?
Has anyone out there succeeded in this kind of persuasion before?
- by SaneIT, Data Doctor
- 1/6/2017 9:01:52 AM
I think there are two issues here. The first is using Excel as a database, the second is using it as a reporting tool. The larger of the two issues is using it as a database and it is one of my biggest pet peeves when I see data duplicated into a hand entered Excel file. Less frightening is Excel as a reporting tool. Using data connectors to get your data from an actual database eases that issue but as noted in the article some times the crazy formulas used in Excel can make a real mess. I instruct people that if they find themselves doing weird math tricks that the more appropriate method is building a view on the database server to do that math. That way there's no fiddling with things and trying to make data sets match up. No offense intended to the data professionals who work outside of an IT team but you really should have a great relationship with your database guys, learn to speak their language and you'll be amazed at how helpful they'll be. They live for this kind of thing even you're in an organization that is filled with red tape I'm sure they would rather give you the data you need in a format you can use than watch you try hammering square pegs into round holes.
- by Zimana, Blogger
- 1/5/2017 4:20:04 PM
True, sometimes professionals are resistant to change. We have to know our tools are reliable and fit our process to tackling tasks. Excel has been around long enough to build resistance to more advanced tools, even if those tools are really not as complaex as they used to be. It's like assuming a car still has a carburetor and warms up slowly, when really fuel injection and better engine management is actually in place (as well as better experience).
- by T Sweeney, Blogger
- 1/5/2017 2:26:57 PM
It's not a perfect analogy, but an accountant I worked with years ago had a bookkeeping program she treasured that used MS-DOS. Which even in the summer of 2001 when she insisted I use it was a bit retro.
Our brains are resistant to change; I see my own tendencies here ("Another social media platform to learn/post to?" grumble grumble grumble). A function of age? Technology fatigue? probably some combo.
- by Zimana, Blogger
- 1/5/2017 11:11:28 AM
Most managers don't realize that plugins and other tools have morphed excel's role as being more than a spreadsheet, yet definately not a replacement for a database. Tools like Neo4j are also overlooked - the interfaces on those tools are more people-friendly. I think the interface on excel is what draws people - it's a spreadsheet and familiar to the most unsavvy professional. Says something about innovation of professionals - it's low - but also attest to how good that interface was.